There are many risks related to driving in the desert. On hot days, vehicles, especially those in poor condition, might overheat. Motorists also need to protect themselves from running out of fuel while they are far from a service station or any other kind of amenities.

Such concerns often take top priority, with people checking their fuel and fluid levels carefully before heading to the desert or leaving a gas station. However, there is another safety risk that looms large out on the desert roads and which could have catastrophic implications for the people in a vehicle. Especially when temperatures rise in the summer, motorists need to understand what might cause a tire blowout.

Speed and low pressure are a dangerous combination

The design of the tires on vehicles helps them to grip the road while maintaining structural integrity even at high speeds. Most vehicle and tire manufacturers provide clear instructions on the pressure level required for proper performance. However, motorists tend to ignore the warning signs of their air pressure dropping in their tires.

Low pressure in tires can be very dangerous, as it may increase the heat generated while driving and therefore put the motorist at elevated risk of a tire blowout. The best-case scenario in a tire blowout is that the driver slows down and replaces their tire shortly afterward. Often, they might have to wait for hours in the scorching heat for someone in a tow truck to provide assistance, especially if they have had their tires replaced or rotated at a facility that uses special tools to tighten the lug nuts on the tires. The worst-case scenario involves somebody losing control of their vehicle because of a blowout at high speeds. They might collide with another vehicle or experience a rollover that leaves them injured and incapable of contacting help.

Safety should be the top priority in a dangerous environment

Motorists don’t necessarily have control over where they need to travel, but they can at least be proactive about making their safe arrival a top priority. Those who understand what causes blowouts will be in a better position to ensure that their tires are safe to drive on during the hottest months in the desert.

Identifying and addressing known risk factors can help someone avoid a collision – or at least avoid a designation of personal fault for a crash – because of preventable issues, like a tire blowout.

Posted in Auto Accidents | No Comments »

Nothing beats a bowl of popcorn as a snack, whether you’re watching a blockbuster movie or want something light to nibble. Popcorn also is quite versatile because you can combine it with various ingredients to produce different flavors.

Yet when you think of popcorn flavors, you don’t think of stuff like perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl. The two “forever chemicals” – because they don’t degrade naturally – are why two Northern California residents have filed a lawsuit against Campbell Soup Company.

According to the complaint, Campbell’s Pop Secret popcorn product had dangerously high levels of PFAS, which studies have linked to health problems such as liver and immune system damage and cancer. The two claimants also said the chemicals were present in 10 of Pop Secret’s flavored popcorn products.

In their lawsuit, the claimants cited consumer report test results which found that Pop Secret had 3,641 parts-per-million of total fluorine content, proving that the products had PFAS. They also maintained that the fluorine came from the microwavable bags used for the products.

The lawsuit was filed earlier this week in the Northern District of California.

Food product liability lawsuits

You can sue for a defective food product like you can file a lawsuit for a defective car. Unlike regular personal injury cases, the consumer doesn’t have to prove the manufacturer’s negligence in these lawsuits. Instead, you must demonstrate the following:

• The food product had a clear defect.
• You consumed the food product as intended.
• The defect harmed you in some way.
• The manufacturer can pay compensation for the harm you suffered.

Using the toxic popcorn case as an example, you could sue the product manufacturer if it’s proven that you suffered damage to your immune system or liver from overeating the popcorn. The damages from the lawsuit can help pay for your medical expenses.

If you plan to file a lawsuit for a food defect that caused you harm, you must remember that you’ll be up against a large business with many resources at its disposal. Expect your lawsuit to be an uphill battle, especially if the food manufacturer employs its legal team to attempt to dismiss the case. You might want to consult an attorney who can help build your case and defend your rights in court.

Posted in Personal Injury | No Comments »

SUVs are the success story of the last decade for car manufacturers. Somehow, they have managed to take a vehicle designed for those driving around ranches or through the mountains and persuade scores of city dwellers that they too need one.

One of the ways they did this was to talk about how the higher driving position gives you a better view of the road. 

The manufacturers are not telling you the whole truth

Yes, you can see more when you are sitting higher off the ground. Yes, that sturdy build may protect you and your passengers more than a smaller car if you roll your vehicle. However, you need to offset that with the fact that your chances of crashing are increased by the thicker pillars needed to make the roof so sturdy. 

SUVs were designed for off-road use, where the chance of a rollover was high. People driving around cities don’t roll their cars that often as they are driving on flat tarmac, not off-camber gravel. So they have less need for a bombproof roof. While added safety is always nice, the thicker pillars make seeing out of the windows much more difficult because they increase the blind spots. That can be bad news for anyone inside the vehicle and for others around them.

If an SUV hits you, its weight and size mean you will likely need significant compensation for your injuries. Finding out more about your legal options can help you get it.

Posted in Auto Accidents | No Comments »

It’s very dangerous to turn left. This is true for any driver in any situation. Left turns are inherently more dangerous than most other driving maneuvers because they require one car to cross the oncoming traffic lanes.

But one group that faces an elevated level of risk is motorcyclists. There are two reasons why left turns are more problematic for them and why they are one of the most common motorcycle accidents to take place.

Drivers don’t see motorcycles

The big problem is that a lot of drivers will turn left in front of motorcycles that they didn’t see. Some drivers don’t even really look for motorcycles, concentrating on larger vehicles. Others may not see a motorcycle because the dark color blends into the pavement. Still others may see the bike but assume that it is farther away because of its small size. They might misjudge the speed of the bike and turn when there is not enough space to do so.

Riders have no protection

The second part of the problem is that a motorcycle rider has very little protection. A left-turn accident means the bike is going to impact the side of the car that is turning. The rider can’t swerve to avoid that crash, as they would be swerving into oncoming traffic. Helmets and other equipment can help, but riders face a severe risk of serious injuries.

Have you been injured in a motorcycle accident? 

Those who have been injured need to know all of the legal options they have to seek financial compensation. If you have been injured, compensation may help with medical bills, lost wages and many other costs. Experienced guidance can help you learn more. 

Posted in Auto Accidents | No Comments »

Jaywalking has already been common, even if not actually legal. When people need to get across the street, they don’t always want to go out of the way to wait until they’ve reached a crosswalk or intersection.

If there’s no oncoming traffic, why not? Here’s what you should know:

Understanding jaywalking laws

At the beginning of this year, it became easier to jaywalk without risking getting a traffic citation. The Freedom to Walk Act says that officers can only ticket pedestrians who jaywalk if they cross “when a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of a collision.”

Many of those who advocated for the new law argued that police were handing out these tickets disproportionately. One civil rights attorney noted that “our jaywalking laws were used as a pretext to stop and harass people, especially low-income people and people of color.” These were often people who live in areas where crosswalks are rare, and a jaywalking citation is often unaffordable.

It remains to be seen whether car vs. pedestrian collisions will increase due to this new law. Pedestrians typically suffer far worse injuries in these crashes than those in vehicles.

Both pedestrians and drivers need to be aware of their surroundings. Drivers need to realize that there may be pedestrians crossing the street outside of a crosswalk or intersection. 

Unfortunately, if a driver is speeding, under the influence or distracted, they may not be able to stop in time to avoid a pedestrian. If you or a loved one has suffered injuries caused by a driver, you may be looking at significant medical bills and a lengthy recovery time. It’s crucial that you get the compensation you’re due. Having legal guidance can help you ensure that you do.

Posted in Auto Accidents | No Comments »

Drivers in California often take great care to avoid getting into a crash. Those who do end up in a wreck typically expect that insurance will take care of their costs. After all, every licensed driver with a registered vehicle in the state is required to have insurance.

California law mandates both property damage and bodily injury liability coverage, which means that those who are not to blame for a crash can usually pursue a simple insurance claim after a wreck. While there typically is insurance coverage that can help after a crash, many motorists discover that it will not be sufficient given the total losses they incur.

Why do insurance challenges often leave people struggling financially after a wreck?

People depend on the driver at fault for coverage

The biggest issue with liability insurance is that people don’t control their own protection after a crash. They instead have to depend on the other driver to make good decisions about their insurance policy. Some motorists are irresponsible and cancel their policies or allow them to lapse due to missed payments. Others only ever purchase the insurance that the state says is necessary and nothing more.

After a serious collision, the motorist at fault might only have $15,000 in bodily injury coverage and $5,000 in property damage coverage to reimburse the person hurt in the crash. Although drivers generally have the option of increasing what liability coverage they carry and adding additional protection to their policies, quite a few motorists only carry what the state requires, and some fail to do even now.

Insurance issues often lead to civil court

When there isn’t enough insurance to cover someone’s vehicle replacement expenses or medical bills after a car wreck, they may have the option of filing a personal injury lawsuit. California law permits civil claims against both individuals and businesses whose actions or negligence cause major collisions.

The people who are not to blame for a crash should not have to absorb the costs generated by someone else’s mistakes, provided that they can prove who was at fault and show evidence of their economic losses. Seeking legal guidance to better understand the issues that often stem from California’s insurance approach can help people more effectively protect their interests after a wreck.

Posted in Auto Accidents | No Comments »

Damages in a personal injury claim can either be economic or non-economic. Economic damages are the direct financial losses from the accident, like medical bills and lost wages. On the other hand, non-economic damages are non-monetary losses like pain and suffering, emotional anguish, loss of consortium and a diminished quality of life.

Proving non-economic damages in a personal injury claim can be challenging as they are subjective and cannot be quantified. For instance, you cannot provide receipts showing the degree of pain or emotional anguish you suffered. So, how can you prove the non-economic damages you are entitled to? Here is how you can go about it.

Medical evidence and expert testimony are key

Medical records can help demonstrate the severity of your injuries, which can help infer the pain and suffering you endured. Medical evidence can also provide a basis for expert testimony from doctors and other medical professionals like psychologists who can speak to your pain, suffering and long-term prognosis.

Testimony from friends and family

Your close friends and family members can also testify how your injuries have affected your emotional well-being, relationships and ability to enjoy life. Their testimony can help show how your life has changed for the worse since the accident.

Your personal statements and journals

Your journal entries can provide a firsthand account of how your injuries have affected your daily life and emotional well-being. These can be powerful pieces of evidence when presented in court.

Proper legal guidance can go a long way

Proving non-economic damages in a personal injury claim requires a combination of evidence and expert testimony. Remember, you cannot claim compensation for damages you cannot prove.

It explains the importance of seeking informed counsel to help you gather the necessary evidence and build your case. It can significantly increase your chances of getting an appropriate settlement.

Posted in Personal Injury | No Comments »

There are thousands of auto accidents every day. Drivers often don’t cause accidents because of who they are but because of their actions.

There are a few common actions that lead to auto accidents. Two tend to stand out more than others. Here’s what you should know:

1. Distractions are a major source of modern problems

One of the biggest causes of auto accidents is distractions. A distraction is anything that disrupts a driver’s attention. A distracted driver may take their hands off the wheel, eyes off the road and mind off of driving. 

The most modern distraction is the phone. Ever since phones have been portable, people have been carrying them into their cars. If a phone suddenly rings a driver may mindlessly reach for it. The same thing can be said if the driver gets a text, but texting may take more focus than talking. But, both are dangerous driving habits. 

Another kind of distraction is eating. Many people eat while they drive. Perhaps it’s a small snack on a long trip or a quick meal before getting to work. Either way, a driver who’s eating may cause a serious accident. 

2. Drinking and driving still hasn’t stopped 

Alcohol is a commonly consumed beverage. It can seemingly make people more social and, at times, is enjoyable to drink. But, it can come with a deadly cost when people choose to drink and drive. Despite all the warnings, laws and education campaigns, drunk driving is still and issue.

Drunk drivers may suffer from impaired vision, focus and judgment. For example, a drunk driver may misjudge the distance between vehicles and end up causing an accident. Or, a driver may run a red light and cause a collision.

If you’re in an accident and suffer from injuries and losses, then you may need to act fast to seek compensation. There are crucial steps that can improve the outcome of a legal battle. 

Posted in Auto Accidents | No Comments »

Generally speaking, a property owner is not expected to control a trespasser’s movements on their property. Consequently, they cannot guarantee a trespasser’s safety.

However, this does not explicitly exonerate the property owner from blame should a trespasser get hurt while on their property. There are instances when you can successfully file a premises liability claim, for example, if you are hurt by someone’s dog while you are technically trespassing on their property.

What duties do property owners owe?

Legally, trespassing refers to entering another person’s property without their consent or permission. Most of the time, property owners owe some degree of care, even to trespassers. This duty of care may be heightened in the event of “continuous” trespassing.

When people walk trespass on a property on a regular basis, say a footpath to a common space cuts through the property, then the property ought to expect continuous trespassing. As such, the property owner is required to warn about potential hazards, like an aggressive dog, that someone may encounter while trespassing on the property. An example of such a warning would be a “Beware of dogs” label at a clearly visible location like the property’s entrance.

The property owner cannot engage in a “willful and wanton” conduct

A property owner is deemed to have engaged in wanton conduct when their reckless indifference exposes a trespasser to injury. Willful conduct, on the other hand, refers to the property owner’s knowledge of the existence of a dangerous condition or hazard, like a ferocious dog, but then failing to take steps to restrain the animal.

Protecting your rights

Legal issues concerning dog-owner liability to a trespasser can be complicated, to say the least. Learning more about California’s dog bite laws with the assistance of a legal professional can help you to pursue justice if you are hurt while on someone else’s property, even if you weren’t there with their explicit permission.

Posted in Animal Bite Law | No Comments »

With millions of households in America having dogs as a part of the family, they are among the most popular pets. For the most part, dogs make great companions. That being said, they are animals which means their behaviors and body language differs from humans. 

You may see a dog baring its teeth at you and know to be wary. But, is teeth baring always a sign of aggression when a canine does this? 

Distinguishing between play and aggression 

All dogs have sharp teeth and they can look intimidating when baring them, especially if the dog is a large breed. However, a dog may do this when they are simply playing, which is why it’s important to look out for other body language signals. While there are no guarantees, if a dog is sneezing lightly, wagging its tail and has a relaxed posture, then it is generally comfortable with the scenario, even if its teeth are exposed. 

Of course, a dog baring its teeth may also be a sign that it is about to attack. The reasons behind dog aggression vary. Some dogs are trained to be protective, while others are just more fearful of strangers. There are also cases when a dog will bare its teeth and potentially bite because it is in pain and feels backed into a corner. 

It’s important to be careful around any dog you do not know. If they bare their teeth, then it isn’t worth taking any chances by approaching them. Dog owners have a legal responsibility to control their animals. If you have been bitten by a dog that was not under control, then you may be able to hold the owner to account for your injuries. Seek further guidance to find out more about your options. 

Posted in Animal Bite Law | No Comments »