Law Offices of Vondra & Hanna

Blog / Personal Injury

Lawsuit claims premium popcorn product contains forever chemicals

Nothing beats a bowl of popcorn as a snack, whether you’re watching a blockbuster movie or want something light to nibble. Popcorn also is quite versatile because you can combine it with various ingredients to produce different flavors.

Yet when you think of popcorn flavors, you don’t think of stuff like perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl. The two ā€œforever chemicalsā€ – because they don’t degrade naturally – are why two Northern California residents have filed a lawsuit against Campbell Soup Company.

According to the complaint, Campbell’s Pop Secret popcorn product had dangerously high levels of PFAS, which studies have linked to health problems such as liver and immune system damage and cancer. The two claimants also said the chemicals were present in 10 of Pop Secret’s flavored popcorn products.

In their lawsuit, the claimants cited consumer report test results which found that Pop Secret had 3,641 parts-per-million of total fluorine content, proving that the products had PFAS. They also maintained that the fluorine came from the microwavable bags used for the products.

The lawsuit was filed earlier this week in the Northern District of California.

Food product liability lawsuits

You can sue for a defective food product like you can file a lawsuit for a defective car. Unlike regular personal injury cases, the consumer doesn’t have to prove the manufacturer’s negligence in these lawsuits. Instead, you must demonstrate the following:

  • The food product had a clear defect.
  • You consumed the food product as intended.
  • The defect harmed you in some way.
  • The manufacturer can pay compensation for the harm you suffered.

Using the toxic popcorn case as an example, you could sue the product manufacturer if it’s proven that you suffered damage to your immune system or liver from overeating the popcorn. The damages from the lawsuit can help pay for your medical expenses.

If you plan to file a lawsuit for a food defect that caused you harm, you must remember that you’ll be up against a large business with many resources at its disposal. Expect your lawsuit to be an uphill battle, especially if the food manufacturer employs its legal team to attempt to dismiss the case. You might want to consult an attorney who can help build your case and defend your rights in court.

Posted in:

Related Posts

Are Punitive Damages Available in Personal Injury Cases in California?

The primary goal of a personal injury lawsuit is to compensate you for harm caused by another's misconduct. However, in some circumstances, the court may also allow punitive damages in addition to compensatory damages. These damages, secured with the legal support of a personal injury attorney in Victorville, CA, are not meant to reimburse you for losses. Instead, they serve a different function: to punish a defendant whose behavior goes far beyond ordinary negligence. Under California law, you may recover punitive damages by effectively proving by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with bad intentions or without considering the dangerous ramifications of their actions. These terms have specific legal definitions. more “Malice” includes conduct that shows a willful disregard for the safety or rights of others. “Oppression” refers to the abuse of power that subjects victims to unjust hardship. “Fraud” involves intentional deception designed to cause harm. All three infringe on a person's rights under federal and state law. Demonstrating Intentional or Reckless Conduct To support a claim for punitive damages, your evidence must show more than poor judgment or a mistake. For example, if a defendant knowingly drives under the influence of alcohol and causes a crash, that conduct may support a punitive damages claim because it reflects a conscious disregard for safety. Similarly, if a business owner intentionally hides a dangerous condition on their property that causes you harm, that could meet the legal standard for malicious conduct. Establishing the Defendant's Financial Condition California law requires the court to consider the defendant's financial condition when determining the amount of punitive damages. You must submit evidence that shows the defendant's wealth, income, or net worth. Courts do this to ensure that the penalty has a meaningful impact based on the defendant's resources. If you do not present sufficient financial documentation, the court may deny or reduce the punitive award, even if liability is established. Evaluating Whether Punitive Damages Apply to Your Case Not all personal injury cases qualify for punitive damages. For example, standard rear-end car accidents caused by distraction or fatigue generally do not rise to the level of malice or oppression. However, if the defendant engaged in road rage, excessive speeding in a residential area, or intentional aggression, you may have a valid claim for additional damages. We examine the facts of your case carefully to determine whether the conduct meets California's statutory threshold. Punitive damages in California serve a different legal purpose than compensation. They apply only when the defendant's behavior is so reckless, malicious, or fraudulent that a financial penalty is justified beyond your actual damages. Schedule a consultation with us today at the Law Offices of Vondra & Hanna in Victorville, CA, and let us help you pursue every legal remedy available to you under California state law.

How Can I Estimate Future Medical Costs for My Personal Injury Claim?

In the aftermath of an accident, it is easy to assume that the journey to recovery will be swift and easy. But we know that this is not always the case. At the Law Offices of Vondra & Hanna in Victorville, CA, a personal injury attorney from our team will work with you to make sure your personal injury claims fully account for both current and future expenses. Estimating the cost of future medical care can be overwhelming, but our team is here to lighten the load and support you on your path to affordable recovery. Involving Medical Professionals to Assess Future Needs A key part of estimating future medical expenses is obtaining input from healthcare providers who are familiar with your condition. Treating physicians, surgeons, specialists, and physical therapists can provide detailed assessments about your long-term prognosis. These professionals help identify what types of treatments you will likely need in the future, such as surgeries, rehabilitation, medication, or durable medical equipment. An attorney can then review these documents to help determine the long-term cost of recovery, which will be considered in your claim. more Documenting The Impact of Injury on Your Daily Life We also examine how your injury affects your ability to recover physically and function daily. For example, if a spinal injury limits your mobility or requires ongoing care, the costs associated with personal assistance, occupational therapy, and home modifications must be considered. We evaluate how your daily activities are impacted and what level of care will be needed to maintain your quality of life. In the state of California, courts will also consider damages if you've experienced loss of enjoyment of life. This includes the impact of your injury on your social life. While loss of enjoyment of life can be more difficult to determine, expert legal representation can ensure that this category of suffering is also considered in your settlement. Incorporating Mental Health Treatment Into Cost Projections When estimating future medical costs for a personal injury claim, it's important to include the potential need for mental health care. Many individuals experience psychological effects following a serious injury, including anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress. These conditions can require therapy, counseling, and sometimes medication over an extended period. At the Law Offices of Vondra & Hanna, we ensure that these types of care are not overlooked when calculating future damages. Quality Representation: The Benefit of a Personal Injury Attorney in Victorville, CA Our practice works tirelessly to ensure that all our clients are afforded a fair chance to receive compensation for their injury. We offer free consultations, and we also refrain from charging our clients unless we win their case. No matter the extent of your injury or your financial standing, our attorneys are equipped with the legal expertise and knowledge of local law to support you on your path to fair compensation. Estimating future medical costs involves detailed analysis and professional input. By working with experienced medical and financial professionals, we help ensure that your settlement or award includes compensation for short-term and long-term care. Schedule a free consultation with us today at the Law Offices of Vondra & Hanna in Victorville, CA.

Can I Collect Damages If I Share Some Fault in an Accident?

Accidents often involve more than one contributing factor, and it's not uncommon for multiple parties to share responsibility. If you were partially responsible for an accident, that does not automatically prevent you from recovering compensation. A personal injury attorney in Victorville, CA, can ensure you have all the information you need to confidently move forward with your case. Under California's pure comparative negligence system, you can recover damages even if you are found to be 99 percent at fault for the accident. The amount you recover will be reduced based on your percentage of responsibility. For example, if your total damages equal $100,000, and you are determined to be 40 percent at fault, your compensation would be reduced by 40 percent, resulting in a $60,000 recovery. This approach allows for a fair distribution of financial responsibility based on each party's role in the incident. more We analyze how the comparative negligence rule applies to your case and help you develop evidence to minimize the share of fault attributed to you. Insurance companies and defense attorneys often try to shift blame to reduce their financial liability, so you need to be prepared with a strong case. An experienced attorney can ensure that you present a strong case to receive the settlement you need. Evidence and Fault Allocation In any personal injury case involving shared fault, the allocation of responsibility is a major point of contention. Insurance adjusters, judges, and juries look at evidence such as witness statements, photographs, medical reports, police findings, and expert opinions to determine fault. We work with you to gather documentation that supports your version of events and establishes the other party's role in causing the accident. In many personal injury cases, more than one person is likely to be at fault. For example, in a car accident, one driver may have been speeding while the other failed to yield. Each action is considered when assigning fault percentages. Even if your actions played a role, we focus on proving that the other party had a greater impact on the outcome and should bear more responsibility for the damages. Legal Strategy and Negotiations When we handle a case involving shared fault, we make sure that any agreement reflects a fair assessment of the facts. If negotiations do not result in a satisfactory outcome, we are fully prepared to present your case in court. In California, jurors are instructed to weigh each party's actions and assign fault accordingly. Our goal is to ensure your responsibility is not overstated and that your right to compensation is preserved. In California, sharing fault in an accident does not prevent you from collecting damages. Even if you were partly to blame, you still have the right to pursue compensation for your injuries and losses. Schedule a consultation with us today at the Law Offices of Vondra & Hanna in Victorville, CA, to present a strong case to secure the recovery you are entitled to under state law.